By Alfie Birds
Utilising SDTM mapping can prove hugely important with regards to enhancing various sports. Sporting governments can often fail to fully appreciate the potential notable differences which utilising technology properly can have in their sport. All sports should look to make the plunge with regards to immersing their sport in technology in whatever way they possibly can. However, this has created some notable animosity within some sports where there is considerable resistance towards the introduction of technology within the game. The sport which has encountered the most animosity towards technology has undoubtedly been within football.
Introducing SDTM mapping into the sport of football may see viewers of the sport come flocking back with affection for the ‘beautiful game’. Huge numbers of people recently have been turned away from football due to the sports obsession with VAR technology. Many high-profile football matches are being ruined by the obsession of constantly checking every passage of play with technology. For the average fan who watches the majority of games from the comfort of their own home technology probably makes the sport even more entertaining. However, for the genuine supporters who attend games and spend huge sums of money their overall experience is unquestionably being affected.
One of the biggest reasons why people pay the extortionate ticket prices is due to their emotional attachment to their team. People attend football matches to support their team as they feel attached to how they perform. If their team performs well, they enjoy positive emotions and poor performances result in negative feelings. This is exhibited clearly throughout various moments in a match. Split second moments such as the ball hitting the back of the net or a player being sent off are hugely engaging moments within football matches. However, thanks to VAR so many of these moments are being taken away from supporters.
There have already been numerous moments last season which ruined key moments in crucial games. There were numerous spectacles within the game which were marred with technological interference. For example, the world cup final in 2018 was watched by considerably over 1 billion people worldwide. Around twenty minutes into this game there was a penalty awarded which was for the most minuscule hand ball which was incredibly harsh. This had a monumental impact on the quality of the overall game with huge amounts of people switching off.
As has already been mentioned, although some television viewers may have been frustrated at this it is unlikely that they had their overall experience impacted. However, people inside the stadium may have paid hundreds of pounds for their ticket. One of the most influential moments in the entirety of the world cup was decided by a referee looking at a monitor. People at the game were not provided with the opportunity to see this decision until after they returned home from the game or on their social media at half time. This is undoubtedly nowhere near good enough and severely affects the quality of the overall spectacle.
27 May 2020
15 October 2019
09 October 2019
30 August 2019
08 August 2019
Powered By Impressive Business WordPress Theme